home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Aminet 40
/
Aminet 40 (2000)(Schatztruhe)[!][Dec 2000].iso
/
Aminet
/
util
/
virus
/
VirusExecutor.lha
/
VirusExecutor
/
BUG_REPORT
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2000-09-25
|
2KB
|
117 lines
BUG REPORT FORM
for
VirusExecutor by Jan Erik Olausen
(virusexecutor@c2i.net)
THE FOLLOWING IS TESTED BY
---------------------------------------------------------------------
YOUR NAME:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EMAIL ADDRESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
COUNTRY:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Just replace my configuration examples...
PROGRAM VERSIONS
----------------
VirusExecutor: 2.03
VirusExecutor.patches: 1.11
VirusExecutor.catalog: norsk 1.2
reqtools.library: 38.1436
xvs.library: 33.21
xfdmaster.library: 39.7
YOUR MACHINE CONFIGURATION
--------------------------
MACHINE TYPE: A4000
CPU/CLOCK: 68060/50Mhz
FPU/CLOCK: 68060/50Mhz
MMU/STATUS: 68060/In use
PPC: None
KICKSTART VERSION: 40.68
ROMUPDATE VERSION: 44.6
WORKBENCH VERSION: 44.2
AMOUNT OF CHIP MEMORY: 2 Mb
AMOUNT OF FAST MEMORY: 40 Mb
BOARDS INSTALLED: None
THE DETAILS OF THE FOUND BUG(S):
--------------------------------
The guru code number by consequence of the bug:
The bug is tested with Snoopdos or program alike said the following
before the guru:
DOCUMENTATION
-------------
I never read documantations
The documentation is ok
The documentation is too diffecult to understand
Some parts of the documentation which is diffecult to understand
The english spelling is ok
The english spelling is too diffecult to understand
There is some parts of the doc which is diffecult to understand
There is wrong (old) program versions mentioned in the doc's
Some details of of the documentation to improve:
------------------------------------------------
(Write a little comment concerning your opinion e.g. correct the doc
and add the lines here ( Please use line number for every line from
the original doc for an easy feed-back)
IMPROVMENTS
I have the following suggestions:
ENFORCER TEST
I have tested the above program with my MMU unit and I got the following
report: